โ† Back to case studies

Rescuing a Failed Odoo Implementation Run by Overseas Resources

โ„น๏ธ

To protect the privacy of the client and the partner involved, we have not named either party in this case study. The details are real โ€” only the names have been omitted.

The situation

A mid-sized wholesale distribution business in Melbourne was growing fast and needed to move off spreadsheets and disconnected systems. They needed an ERP โ€” inventory, purchasing, sales, accounting, and warehouse management all in one place. After evaluating a few options, they chose Odoo.

They signed with a well-known Odoo partner โ€” a company with an impressive website, a decent tier badge, and a polished sales process. The discovery sessions were run by the head of the Australian branch โ€” an experienced, articulate consultant who clearly understood their business. The client felt confident.

What went wrong

The senior consultant vanished

Within two weeks of signing the contract, the senior Australian consultant was gone. The project was handed to an offshore team โ€” a project manager based overseas, two developers in a different timezone, and a "functional consultant" who had clearly never worked with an Australian business before.

The client was told this was "standard process" and that the offshore team was "highly experienced." The Australian consultant would "check in from time to time."

Offshore resources couldn't answer Australian questions

This is where things started to fall apart. The business had straightforward but Australia-specific requirements:

  • BAS reporting โ€” The offshore team didn't understand how BAS works. They configured GST codes incorrectly, mixing up GST-free and input-taxed supplies. When asked about BAS reconciliation, they said they'd "get back to you."
  • Superannuation โ€” Questions about super guarantee rates, STP Phase 2 reporting, and clearing house integration were met with blank stares on video calls. Every question required "checking with the team" and a 2โ€“3 day turnaround.
  • Bank feeds โ€” The team didn't know about Australian bank feed providers (Basiq, Yodlee via CDR). They tried to configure a generic bank sync that doesn't work with Australian banks.
  • Shipping & logistics โ€” Australia Post, StarTrack, TNT โ€” the offshore team had never heard of these carriers and couldn't configure shipping rules for Australian postcodes and zone-based pricing.
  • Award interpretation โ€” The client had warehouse staff under the General Retail Industry Award. The offshore PM didn't know what an "award" was in the Australian employment context.
โš ๏ธ

Every single Australia-specific question was met with "let me get back to you." The turnaround was 2โ€“3 business days minimum. For a project that was supposed to take 12 weeks, this alone added months of delays.

Timezone misery

The offshore team was 5+ hours behind Melbourne. Meetings were either at 7am or 8pm. The PM would send end-of-day updates at 2am AEST. Urgent questions asked on Monday morning Australian time wouldn't get a response until Tuesday. The client's staff were spending more time chasing the implementation partner than doing their actual jobs.

Configuration was a mess

Six months in, the client had spent over $90,000 and the system was nowhere near go-live:

  • Chart of accounts was based on a non-Australian template โ€” no BAS mapping, incorrect GST treatment
  • Inventory valuation was set to FIFO when the business needed Average Cost (AVCO)
  • Purchase orders were configured without landed cost support, which was a core requirement
  • Warehouse operations had been set up for a single-step workflow when the business needed three-step (pick โ†’ pack โ†’ ship)
  • Customer payment terms were hardcoded instead of using Odoo's native payment terms engine
  • No automated bank reconciliation โ€” all bank entries were being created manually

How we got involved

The client found us through a referral. They were frustrated, behind schedule, and had lost confidence in the entire project. They asked us to do an independent audit of their Odoo instance and give them an honest assessment.

We spent two days reviewing their configuration, data, and the partner's documentation. Our findings were blunt:

  • The chart of accounts needed to be rebuilt from scratch with proper Australian BAS mapping
  • Inventory configuration needed a complete redo โ€” valuation method, routes, and warehouse structure
  • The data migration scripts had errors that would have caused reconciliation failures at go-live
  • Several "custom developments" were just poorly configured standard Odoo features
  • There was no testing environment โ€” all changes were being made directly in production

What we did

The client terminated their contract with the previous partner and engaged us to fix the implementation and take it to go-live. Here's what we did:

  • Week 1โ€“2: Full reconfiguration โ€” Rebuilt the chart of accounts with correct BAS categories. Reconfigured inventory valuation (AVCO), warehouse operations (3-step), and purchase workflows with landed costs.
  • Week 3: Data migration cleanup โ€” Rewrote the migration scripts. Imported clean supplier, customer, product, and opening balance data with full reconciliation checks.
  • Week 4: Australian-specific setup โ€” Configured Basiq bank feeds, correct GST/BAS treatment for all transaction types, Australian shipping carriers, and payment terms.
  • Week 5โ€“6: User training and UAT โ€” Ran hands-on training sessions with the warehouse team, finance team, and sales team on their actual data. Fixed issues found during testing in real time.
  • Week 7: Go-live โ€” Cutover completed over a weekend. Bank feeds connected. Opening balances verified. Staff were processing real orders on Monday morning.
๐Ÿ’ก

Total time to fix and go live: 7 weeks. Total cost: roughly one-third of what had already been spent with the previous partner.

The lesson

This isn't a story about offshore resources being inherently bad at their jobs. Many are technically competent. The problem is context. Australian businesses operate in a specific regulatory, tax, employment, and logistics environment. When your implementation partner can't answer basic questions about BAS, super, awards, or local shipping carriers without "getting back to you," every conversation becomes a research project instead of a productive working session.

An Australian-based consultant who has done this work dozens of times knows the answers immediately. They've configured BAS categories hundreds of times. They know which bank feed provider works with which bank. They understand what a Modern Award is. That institutional knowledge is the difference between a 7-week implementation and a 6-month money pit.

What to look out for

  • Ask who will do the day-to-day work โ€” If the answer is "our team" without names and locations, press harder.
  • Ask about Australian experience specifically โ€” Not just Odoo experience โ€” Australian business experience. BAS, STP, super, local carriers, CDR bank feeds.
  • Insist on AEST working hours โ€” If your implementation partner isn't available during your business hours, you'll spend months waiting for answers.
  • Request a test: ask an Australian-specific question during the sales process โ€” "How does Odoo handle BAS reporting for mixed supplies?" If they can't answer on the spot, reconsider.

Need a rescue?

If your Odoo implementation has stalled, gone off track, or been handed to a team that can't answer your questions โ€” talk to us. We'll audit what you have, tell you exactly what needs fixing, and give you a fixed price to get it done. Senior Australian consultants, Melbourne-based, available during your working hours.

Facing a similar situation?

We've rescued implementations, recovered databases, and delivered upgrades across Australia. Let's talk about what you need.

Get in touch โ†’